Tuesday, February 24, 2015

For idiot detectives, fbi agents and lazy lawyers...


Are you a detective, FBI agent, lazy lawyer or anyone else confused into thinking these mugshot extortion websites are somehow legal under the first amendment?

We encourage law enforcement, and lazy lawyers to actually DO something rather than pointing fingers and acting stupid.

18 USC § 641 — Public money, property or records 
Government personnel steal government property, knowingly converts government property to their use and the use of others (blackmailers and extortionists). Allows the sale of government property without authority (unpublish fee/reputation repair fee) and retains government property knowing they have been stolen.

Criminal Resource Manual 1663 –
Protection Of Public Records and Documents. “The taking of a public
record or document is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 641.” 
DOJ. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/fo...9/crm01663.htm

18 USC § 1028A - Aggravated identity theft
Whoever, knowingly transfers (steals), possesses, or uses (website), without lawful authority, a means of identification (mugshots) of another person shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years.

Government personnel intentionally place stolen “means of identification” - mugshots on to private website to be restolen and used in domestic and international criminal activity by individuals and organized crime (18 USC §1962).

18 USC § 2261A — Stalking 
Webmasters stalk, harasses, intimidates
and causes substantial emotional distress.

18 USC § 2319 — Criminal Infringement of a copyright & 17 USC § 506 — Criminal offenses For the purpose of commercial advantage (website) and private financial gain (money).




Governmental Prima Facie Evidence of name and likeness copyright:
State Certified Birth Certificate,
State Driver’s License, US Passport and other government documents
and records “created” to identify and validate name and likeness.

Government personnel criminal infringe name and likeness copyrights and supply the means for others to criminal infringe copyrights.

18 USC § 1584 - Sale into involuntary servitude Government personnel globally (world wide web) human traffic Americans who are held hostage by electronic means to be used for involuntary servitude. The individual's daily private life is what promotes and makes money for websites that hold them against their will.

Internet Spyware (I-SPY) Prevention Act of 2007
“Intentionally obtains (screen scraping), or transmits (internet) to another person information with the intent to defraud (unpublish/repair reputation).”

18 USC § 875 - Interstate communications Transmits (internet) communication interstate (world wide web) with the intent to “injure reputation” to extort (unpublish/repair reputation).

18 USC § 873 — Blackmail  As consideration for not informing
demands money (unpublish/repair reputation). Even if truthful it violates 18 USC § 875, see David Letterman case. David Letterman reports blackmail and extortion to the FBI elapsed time to arrests 24 hours. Average citizen reports blackmail and extortion, extortionist give interviews with journalists and time elapsed years and still going.

18 USC § 1962 - Prohibited activities Interstate (world wide web) collection of an unlawful debt (unpublish/repair reputation).

18 USC § 880 - Receiving the proceeds of extortion A person(s) who receives, possesses, conceals, or disposes of any blackmail (unpublish/repair reputation) money.

18 USC § 2 - Principals (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

Government Agencies post stolen government property “means of identification” - mugshots (18 USC § 1028A - Aggravated identity theft) knowing that it will be repeatedly stolen and used in domestic and international criminal activity by individuals and organized crime (18 USC § 1962).

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Offendex/SORArchives family of websites briefly forced offline.

The family of websites under Mr. Rodricks' control was briefly taken offline due to legal complaints. We knew it was just a matter of time the sites went back online. We're leaving this post here for record keeping purposes.

Monday, February 2, 2015

Revenge-porn website operator convicted in San Diego.

Revenge-porn website operator convicted in San Diego

Posted: Feb 02, 2015 5:43 PM PST
Updated: Feb 02, 2015 5:43 PM PST

SAN DIEGO (AP) - A San Diego man charged with running a revenge-porn site where people posted nude pictures of their exes has been convicted of more than two dozen felony charges.

Kevin Bollaert was found guilty Monday of identity theft and extortion.

It's one of the first convictions under a new California law that outlawed revenge porn.

Authorities say Bollaert ran a website where people posted explicit images of their ex-lovers and their names and hometowns without consent, and a second website the victims could contact to have the images removed - for a fee of up to $350.

Authorities say Bollaert made tens of thousands of dollars.

In court, Bollaert's lawyer, Emily Rose-Weber, argued that the business may have been immoral, but it wasn't illegal.

[source] http://www.kmph.com/story/28006642/revenge-porn-website-operator-convicted-in-san-diego

Friday, January 30, 2015

Mugshot Extortionist? Or theft of government data-ist?

We might have been wrong all along on something: Chuck Rodrick might not be a mugshot extortionist. Let me explain:

It was recently brought to my attention something very interesting to ponder:

Mugshots are the general term for "booking photos". Any photos taken by law enforcement for law enforcement purposes as required by law, is actually property of the state. It is NOT property of your average citizen.

We are not reviewing laws state by state to determine what crimes were committed and are still being committed by Rodrick, along with other mugshot "extortion" racket site operates. For all intents and purposes, what Rodrick is doing may be considered THEFT of state property, for the purposes of harassment of those on the states' registries as well as those who've never been convicted of any crime.

We are also now actively monitoring various records for name changes, as we now believe Rodrick may be in the process of legally changing his name (again). If he actually moves forward with this, we'll be working to bring to the attention of the courts why he should not be allowed to do so. We must protect ourselves in the best way we can. Legally.