<!–[endif]–> 6. Expose a secret or an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject anyone to hatred, contempt or ridicule or to impair the person’s credit or business.
<!–[endif]–> B. It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under subsection A, paragraph 5, 6 or 7 that the property obtained by threat of the accusation, exposure, lawsuit or other invocation of official action was lawfully claimed either as: 1. Restitution or indemnification for harm done under circumstances to which the accusation, exposure, lawsuit or other official action relates. 2. Compensation for property that was lawfully obtained or for lawful services. C. Theft by extortion as defined in subsection A, paragraph 1 is a class 2 felony. Otherwise, theft by extortion is a class 4 felony. Sections: Previous 13-1801 13-1802 13-1803 13-1804 13-1805 13-1806 13-1807 13-1808 13-1809 13-1810 13-1811 13-1812 13-1813 13-1814 13-1815 Next Last modified: February 19, 2012 PLEASE NOTE: The defendants do not have an affirmative defense under B1 or B 2. The same or similar statute is law in all 50 states, and the criminal act is subject to prosecution in each of those states. OREGON REVISED STATUTES (Criminal) 164.075 Theft by extortion. (1) A person commits theft by extortion when the person compels or induces another to deliver property to the person or to a third person by instilling in the other a fear that, if the property is not so delivered, the actor or a third person will in the future: (a) Cause physical injury to some person; (b) Cause damage to property; (c) Engage in other conduct constituting a crime; (d) Accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against the person; (e) Expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject some person to hatred, contempt or ridicule; (f) Cause or continue a strike, boycott or other collective action injurious to some person’s business, except that such conduct is not considered extortion when the property is demanded or received for the benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act; (g) Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another’s legal claim or defense; (h) Use or abuse the position as a public servant by performing some act within or related to official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely; or (i) Inflict any other harm that would not benefit the actor. (2) Theft by extortion is a Class B felony. [1971 c.743 §127; 1987 c.158 §27; 2007 c.71 §48]
(1) A person is guilty of extortion in the second degree if he or she commits extortion by means of a wrongful threat as defined in *RCW 9A.04.110(25) (d) through (j).(2) In any prosecution under this section based on a threat to accuse any person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against any person, it is a defense that the actor reasonably believed the threatened criminal charge to be true and that his or her sole purpose was to compel or induce the person threatened to take reasonable action to make good the wrong which was the subject of such threatened criminal charge.(3) Extortion in the second degree is a class C felony.
[2002 c 47 § 2; 1975 1st ex.s. c 260 § 9A.56.130.]
”You’re delusional – it is amazng how may of your kind are so out of touch. Society will start naming your type for the monsters you are – the Sandusky Devils”.Brent
From the Federal Bureau of Prisons website: http://www.bop.gov
Inmate Locator – Locate Federal inmates from 1982 to present
Name Register # Age-Race-Sex Release Date
1. BRENT M OESTERBLAD 25243-008 53-White-M 11-05-1999 RELEASED
Now that we have confirmed that Brent Marshall Oesterblad is the man behind the continued LIES, HARASSMENT and THREATS it is time to get organized.
I have blocked all further email’s from Brent and his team. The next time I have anything to say to Brent will only be in the presence of my attorney and in court.
I want to thank all of you for your EXCELLENT investigative work and your continued comments. I am in no means going anywhere until this is resovled but I have closed the door of communication with Brent.
Please be aware that Brent may be a very dangerous man and may not be beyond harming someone for his own personal gain. Oesterblad has proven throughout the months to be extremely threatening and outright cruel. I have taken various precautions to safeguard myself and family. I have recieved a death threat and various other threats from this vigilante organization. I would ask that you all stay level headed. Please no threats towards Brent and his family. Again I thank you.
WARNING: If Offendex.com has asked for money to remove your record do not pay them. This site is run by 1 convicted felon and others who have been scamming people out of money for years. Please do not fall for this man’s con. The owners are Brent Marshall Oesterblad, David Osterblad and Chuck Rodrick II currently being investigated by the FBI and being sued by this sites owner. Please understand that after you have given them money they will not take down your information, your information is going to stay on their site until we take it down. I would ask that you recognize that this site is very small in size and not popular by any means. It is merely a scam to convince you that everyone is going to take these people and their allegations about you seriously. In most situations this is not the case.
If you are a business and have gone to offendex.com to get information about someone please be aware that offendex.com is a scam and not to be trusted. We advise all employers to get factual information from their local police departments for free. An online investigation that involves a private entity is very risky. www.offendex.com is a private site and a SCAM. They do not provide truthful public information.
This comes from a concerned citizen:
- Tired of hiding says:
That subhuman parasite is trying to get offenders to pay the sum of $250 USD to remove their images from his site. That is clearly misuse of the site that the harvested the images from. I say harvested since he places his url on the image implying ownership of the image. This is a violation of the terms of service of the government sites that he illegally steals the images from. The mere fact that his motive is not to educate but rather to extort money from offenders is harassment or even attempted profit from extortion as you mention.
I would be very willing to join a lawsuit against his website. If enough of us join the suit I am confident that can get this scumbag shut down.
Brent Has actually been asking anywhere form $200 to a $1000 to remove mugshots and personal pictures.