OffendExtortion.com
The Sorarchives , Online Detective and Offendexdata.com Scam
Navigation
  • About Us
  • Attorneys Page
  • Blog
    • News
      • Media Coverage: Federal Lawsuit
  • Defendants
    • Brent M. Oesterblad
    • Chuck D. Rodrick
    • Traci Heisig
  • Other Posts
  • The Lawsuit
    • Evidence
      • The Extortion Factor
      • Their Handy Work
  • The Scams
You are here: Home › Updates › sorarchives scam
General update from Adam →

sorarchives scam

November 19, 2012 | Filed under: Updates
 BREAKING NEWS: Offendex.com is now sorarchives.com. Other sites being used for this scam are onlinedetective.com and offendexdata.com.
“INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS A THREAT TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE”                                            Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. 
______________________________________________________________________________
*SCROOL DOWN TO READ A VERY IMPORTANT UPDATE*
Brent2
THIS IS BRENT MARSHALL OSTERBLAD 
After Osterblad found out that he was going to be served legal papers he has up and left Arizona. Anybody with any current address or information on his whereabouts please contact me immediately at adamg846@aol.com .  Is this something an innocent person would do? I believe Osterblad has been well aware of the criminal act’s on sorarchives.com and the other sites. So Osterblad if you have been doing nothing wrong, why would you take off?? 
  BRENT MARSHALL OSTERBLADS LAST KNOWN ADDRESS :5601 Cabello Drive, Paradise Valley Arizona 85823  
______________________________________________________________________________
 Listen to  Convicted Felon CHUCK RODRICK operator of sorarchives.com. Copy and paste:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naYCZMTuun8&feature=youtu.be

FBI and Attorneys General in every state
FBI tips- https://tips.fbi.gov/
FBI internet fraud- http://www.fbi.gov/scams-safety/fraud/internet_fraud
FBI Cybercrime- http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/cyber
Filing an IC3 complaint (internet crime) http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx
Department of Justice computer/internet crime http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/reporting.html
List of Attorneys General contact information in every state
http://www.naag.org/current-attorneys-general.php
Cut, paste and send this to your state attorney general, the Arizona attorney general, and the FBI
(registered letter is preferred, but can be e mailed)
 
I wish to press charges
To the Honorable (name of your state’s attorney general; FBI field office representative):
 
I reside in (your state), am the victim of extortion (Arizona Revised Statute 13-1804 A(4) and A(6)), and have been harmed directly and indirectly by the Brent Oesterblad criminal enterprise (doing business in the State of Arizona under the names Webexpress, WebX, Sorarchives, Offendex, Offendexdata, Onlinedetective). I hereby demand that your office, and the Arizona Attorney General office file for injunctive relief on behalf of myself and all other victims to shut down the criminal enterprise’s websites, file for and execute a search warrant to confiscate the criminal enterprise’s database, and prosecute the co-conspirators for the criminal conduct that has caused so much harm, and cost so much money for so many people, in so many states. Considering the criminal history of the perpetrators, the concerted effort of co-conspirators, and the cross jurisdictional nature of the crimes, I encourage your office and the office of the Arizona Attorney General to pursue federal wire fraud and RICO charges in coordination with other states’ and commonwealths’ attorneys general.
 
Signed and dated
 
Can be notarized
To the Honorable Tom Horne, Arizona Attorney General:
 
I reside in (your state), am the victim of extortion (Arizona Revised Statute 13-1804 A(4) and A(6)), and have been harmed directly and indirectly by the Brent Oesterblad criminal enterprise (doing business in the State of Arizona under the names Webexpress, WebX, Sorarchives, Offendex, Offendexdata, Onlinedetective). I hereby demand that the Arizona Attorney General office file for injunctive relief on behalf of myself and all other victims to shut down the criminal enterprise’s websites, file for and execute a search warrant to confiscate the criminal enterprise’s database, and prosecute the co-conspirators for the criminal conduct that has caused so much harm, and cost so much money for so many people, in so many states. Considering the criminal history of the perpetrators, the concerted effort of co-conspirators, and the cross jurisdictional nature of the crimes, I encourage the office of the Arizona Attorney General to pursue federal wire fraud and RICO charges in coordination with other states’ and commonwealths’ attorneys general.
 
Signed and dated
 
Can be notarized
ARIZONA Revised Criminal Statutes
13-1804. Theft by extortion; classification
A. A person commits theft by extortion by knowingly obtaining orseeking to obtain property or servicesby means of a threat to do in the future any of the following:
4. Engage in other conduct constituting an offense.
<!–[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]–>
<!–[endif]–>
6. Expose a secret or an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject anyone to hatred, contempt or ridicule or to impair the person’s credit or business.
<!–[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]–>
<!–[endif]–>
B. It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under subsection A, paragraph 5, 6 or 7 that the property obtained by threat of the accusation, exposure, lawsuit or other invocation of official action was lawfully claimed either as:
1. Restitution or indemnification for harm done under circumstances to which the accusation, exposure, lawsuit or other official action relates.
2. Compensation for property that was lawfully obtained or for lawful services.
C. Theft by extortion as defined in subsection A, paragraph 1 is a class 2 felony. Otherwise, theft by extortion is a class 4 felony.
Sections: Previous 13-1801 13-1802 13-1803 13-1804 13-1805 13-1806 13-1807 13-1808 13-1809 13-1810 13-1811 13-1812 13-1813 13-1814 13-1815 Next
Last modified: February 19, 2012
PLEASE NOTE: The defendants do not have an affirmative defense under B1 or B 2. The same or similar statute is law in all 50 states, and the criminal act is subject to prosecution in each of those states.
Cease and Desist Demand:
 All in state and interstate victims of extortion (Arizona Revised Statute 13-1804 A(4) and A(6)), who have been harmed directly or indirectly by the Brent Oesterblad criminal enterprise (doing business in the State of Arizona under the names Webexpress, WebX, Sorarchives, Offendex, Offendexdata, Onlinedetective), demand that the Arizona Attorney General office file for injunctive relief on behalf of said victims to shut down the criminal enterprise’s websites, file for and execute a search warrant to confiscate the criminal enterprise’s database, and prosecute the co-conspirators for the criminal conduct that has caused so much harm and cost so much money for so many people, in so many states. Considering the criminal history of the perpetrators, the concerted effort of co-conspirators, and the cross jurisdictional nature of the crimes, the victims encourage the office of the Arizona Attorney General to pursue federal wire fraud and RICO charges in coordination with other states’ and commonwealths’ attorneys general.
 ARIZONA Revised Criminal Statutes
13-1804. Theft by extortion; classification
A. A person commits theft by extortion by knowingly obtaining orseeking to obtain property or servicesby means of a threat to do in the future any of the following:
 
4. Engage in other conduct constituting an offense.
<!–[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]–>
<!–[endif]–>
6. Expose a secret or an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject anyone to hatred, contempt or ridicule or to impair the person’s credit or business.
<!–[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]–>
<!–[endif]–>
 
B. It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under subsection A, paragraph 5, 6 or 7 that the property obtained by threat of the accusation, exposure, lawsuit or other invocation of official action was lawfully claimed either as:
1. Restitution or indemnification for harm done under circumstances to which the accusation, exposure, lawsuit or other official action relates.
2. Compensation for property that was lawfully obtained or for lawful services.
C. Theft by extortion as defined in subsection A, paragraph 1 is a class 2 felony. Otherwise, theft by extortion is a class 4 felony.
Sections: Previous 13-1801 13-1802 13-1803 13-1804 13-1805 13-1806 13-1807 13-1808 13-1809 13-1810 13-1811 13-1812 13-1813 13-1814 13-1815 Next
Last modified: February 19, 2012
 PLEASE NOTE: The defendants do not have an affirmative defense under B1 or B 2. The same or similar statute is law in all 50 states, and the criminal act is subject to prosecution in each of those states.
 OREGON REVISED STATUTES (Criminal)
164.075 Theft by extortion. (1) A person commits theft by extortion when the person compels or induces another to deliver property to the person or to a third person by instilling in the other a fear that, if the property is not so delivered, the actor or a third person will in the future:
(a) Cause physical injury to some person;
(b) Cause damage to property;
(c) Engage in other conduct constituting a crime;
(d) Accuse some person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against the person;
(e) Expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject some person to hatred, contempt or ridicule;
(f) Cause or continue a strike, boycott or other collective action injurious to some person’s business, except that such conduct is not considered extortion when the property is demanded or received for the benefit of the group in whose interest the actor purports to act;
(g) Testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another’s legal claim or defense;
(h) Use or abuse the position as a public servant by performing some act within or related to official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely; or
(i) Inflict any other harm that would not benefit the actor.
(2) Theft by extortion is a Class B felony. [1971 c.743 §127; 1987 c.158 §27; 2007 c.71 §48]
 
 
Washington state
RCW 9A.56.130
Extortion in the second degree.
(1) A person is guilty of extortion in the second degree if he or she commits extortion by means of a wrongful threat as defined in *RCW 9A.04.110(25) (d) through (j).(2) In any prosecution under this section based on a threat to accuse any person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against any person, it is a defense that the actor reasonably believed the threatened criminal charge to be true and that his or her sole purpose was to compel or induce the person threatened to take reasonable action to make good the wrong which was the subject of such threatened criminal charge.(3) Extortion in the second degree is a class C felony.
[2002 c 47 § 2; 1975 1st ex.s. c 260 § 9A.56.130.]
RCW 9A.04.110

Definitions.

 
 
(22) “Property” means anything of value, whether tangible or intangible, real or personal;(28) “Threat” means to communicate, directly or indirectly the intent:(a) To cause bodily injury in the future to the person threatened or to any other person; or(b) To cause physical damage to the property of a person other than the actor; or(c) To subject the person threatened or any other person to physical confinement or restraint; or(d) To accuse any person of a crime or cause criminal charges to be instituted against any person; or(e) To expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false, tending to subject any person to hatred, contempt, or ridicule; or(f) To reveal any information sought to be concealed by the person threatened; or(g) To testify or provide information or withhold testimony or information with respect to another’s legal claim or defense; or(h) To take wrongful action as an official against anyone or anything, or wrongfully withhold official action, or cause such action or withholding; or(i) To bring about or continue a strike, boycott, or other similar collective action to obtain property which is not demanded or received for the benefit of the group which the actor purports to represent; or(j) To do any other act which is intended to harm substantially the person threatened or another with respect to his or her health, safety, business, financial condition, or personal relationships;(29) “Vehicle” means a “motor vehicle” as defined in the vehicle and traffic laws, any aircraft, or any vessel equipped for propulsion by mechanical means or by sail;(30) Words in the present tense shall include the future tense; and in the masculine shall include the feminine and neuter genders; and in the singular shall include the plural; and in the plural shall include the singular.
[2011 c 336 § 350; 2011 c 166 § 2; 2007 c 79 § 3; 2005 c 458 § 3; 1988 c 158 § 1; 1987 c 324 § 1; 1986 c 257 § 3; 1975 1st ex.s. c 260
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER: The information provided on this website has been gathered by many sources. We have compiled this information over a 6 month period. We are aware that this information may not be 100% accurate. Please do your own research to confirm the information on this site. Please do not asume this information is factual.
More Information: I have received many of your emails and what bothers me the most is that some of you have been so effected by these people that you contemplate suicide. I can tell you that this is not the way out. I can assure you that we will come to a resolve. Please hang in there. If I could end this situation today I would, but there is a process and we will see justice in due time. God Bless you all.
PLEASE READ: It has come to my attention that Mr. Rodrick believes that I am using his ex-wife as my source for information. All though I indeed have a inside source that source is not Lois Flynn (Rodricks ex wife). I have never had any contact with Ms. Flynn nor do I intend to. This statement is factual and I will swear in the court of law when we get there that I have never had contact with Lois Flynn. Mr. Rodrick you need to grow up and start acting like a man. This accusation by Mr. Rodrick is another blatant lie!! I find it interesting that both Rodrick and Osterblad are calling me a liar. We have caught them both in so many lies it’s ridiculous.
Here is a picture of the links on a google search for Lois Flynn:
LoisGalvez
 IMPORTANT: 
 Were Back!

For those of you that truly believed we were gone or that we would “Give Up” the fight, I hate to disappoint you. As you can see we are back.
Why were we gone?
Our site was taken down due to a copyright complaint. The complainant Charels D Rodrick claimed that we obtained his girlfriends (TERESE M HEISIG) picture from his photo site. We in fact obtained the picture from facebook. This was an attempt to take our server down permanently. This is their second attempt, the first server was hacked by these Internet thugs.
WHY?
Some of you may be interested in why Mr.Rodrick would want to have our site taken down. Offendextortion.com has had a huge impact on these guys. Our site outed their con and sent them scurrying. Because of our site Rodrick and his clan had to take drastic measures to move their site. Our warning about this online scam had such an impact, that offendex.com had to shut down. Yes it was everybody’s persistence and hard work that made this happen. This was a victory and the first big step in shutting these extortionists down completely.
What Next?
What is going to happen next is that we are going to follow these guys and reengage on their new servers. sorarchives, (their new offendex) will be getting the same attention as offendex. Ripoffreports will be filed against sorarchives, onlinedetective and offendexdata. We will begin to point our site towards all three of their new sites. We will continue to make the public aware that these sites are a scam.
What about the Lawsuit?
My attorney Janice Belluci is working very hard on the case as we speak. We are looking at a lot of different angles. I can tell you that this is all very exciting as the end result will be no more privately run registry scams. We are hoping that after we have taken down Oysterballs and his clan other sites such as mugshots.com will follow. Mugshots.com is another private registry scam. This being said the whole idea will be to change the law so that these people will not be able to steal other people’s money and lives. WE DO NOT NEED CON ARTISTS RUNNING PRIVATE SOR’S ANY LONGER IT IS TIME FOR THIS TO COME TO AN END! Keep your heads held high and get ready for real justice.
And Finally:
We are going to begin to organize the site a bit. Based on some very good information from my confidential source we labeled Rodrick as a ex-convict and this was not correct. So what we do know to be correct is that Rodrick buys his way out of convictions and let’s his pool boy Osterblad take the fall. Rodrick is committing crimes and he simply has not been caught or arrested to the best of our knowledge. With that being said their is plenty of time for Rodrick to go to jail and with the crimes he is committing now there is a good possibility this will happen in my opinion. With the continued information that we are receiving from my confidential informant and all of the great information all of you are gathering we will soon get it right with Rodrick just like we have with Osterblad. I know a lot of you like to refer to Osterblad as Oysterballs but just so we do not confuse things lets try to stick to his real name. Thank you for your continued support. For the doubters, please remember that we are in this until the end.
Thank You
The most recent Osterblad Threat
“False report you say… or more accurately your good Sandusky buddy Adam. Do you ever get anything right? I am not stupid enough to make a “False” claim. I am certainly not stupid enough to post lies and slander online – unlike you and your Sandusky Clan.
 
So it is Thursday – Saturday Adam posted his site would be up Monday. Gee, he misrepresents the facts — AGAIN. After everything that dude has repeatedly lied about… So what Gordon ?, his relationship with that 13 year old boy – fellatio, anal intercourse and digital anal intercourse – just another “Romeo and…Romeo” scenerio. You guys are delusional.
 
But keep up the yapping Gordon – enjoy yourself while you still can – IT is coming. For your sake, I hope your wife is an understanding woman.
 
Adam’s Comment: 
Osterblad is so far out there. This guy is the king of slander. He believes his own lies. This freak has posted up my family’s names. My family has absolutely nothing to do with this. I would like to see Osterblad prove my family’s involvement. Let’s see an email Osterblad, and we do not want to see one that you have created. Osterblads embellishment of a 17 year old crime in my opinion is the work of a bully, extortionist and sociopath. Osterblad may be a dangerous man.
“Have a nice day”
Adam
UDATED INFORMATION, PLEASE GO TO: CHUCK RODRICK PAGE http://offendextortion.com/?page_id=187
Chuck Rodrick II and Brent Marshall Osterblad continue with there threats and lies in this most recent post on online detective is filled with delirium and rants as well as incorrect information. These guy’s never cease to amaze me.
Here’s one of Osterblad’s rants about Sudusky:
 ”You’re delusional – it is amazng how may of your kind are so out of touch. Society will start naming your type for the monsters you are – the Sandusky Devils”.
 Brent
He often talks about my spelling and grammar, this guy is constantly spelling words wrong. Another sign that it is Osterblad.
Here is what Brent Marshall Osterblad wrote on this forum. Now Brent Originally claimed nobody had contacted him in reference to offnedex.com. Now the story changes. We know for a fact that Brent is one of the owners. Can you say PERJURY Osterblad?  Here is his post:
“My name is Brent Oesterblad. I am not currently, nor have I ever been an owner of the website Offendex.com. I am not currently, nor have I ever been an administrator for the website Offendex.com. I have responded to a complaint filed with the Arizona Attorney General – CIC 12-16488 – making a sworn statement to this fact. The continued harassment by yourself and other parties making such a false claim will be dealt with in the appropriate legal manner.
UPDATE: CHUCK RODRICK along with BRENT MARSHALL OSTERBLAD work for offendex.com and may be the owners of offendex.com. Any additional information that you can find regarding Rodrick will be posted on his very own page. The fight continues. Oesterbald and Rodrick have the impression that I have made this my hobby lol. I think many of you know that this is way more then a hobby. I would again like to reassure all of you that offendex.com’s days are numbered. I appreciate everyone’s help, without it none of this would be possible.
Merry Christmas,
Adam
________________________________________________________________________________
Peter Long on December 30, 2012 at 8:28 am said: Edit

From the Federal Bureau of Prisons website: http://www.bop.gov

Inmate Locator – Locate Federal inmates from 1982 to present
Name Register # Age-Race-Sex Release Date

1. BRENT M OESTERBLAD 25243-008 53-White-M 11-05-1999 RELEASED

 __________________________________________________________________________________
PLEASE LIKE US ON FACEBOOK, LINK BELOW:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Help-End-Offendexcom/539996762695373?ref=hl
__O_F_F_E_N_D_E_X_T_O_R_T_I_O_N_______________________________________________
 I understand a lot of people are getting frustrated. I want to reassure you all that we are working very hard to get these guys and shut down there site. We will be filing a complaint in federal court this week. The other major step that we have made is to confirm the owners. Please hold tight everybody. Please email me at adamg846@aol.com if you have any questions. Please no that I am here for moral support. If you are feeling down and need someone to talk to, I am here. God Bless.
Adam
 _______________________________________________________________________________
VERY IMPORTANT:

Now that we have confirmed that Brent Marshall Oesterblad is the man behind the continued LIES, HARASSMENT and THREATS it is time to get organized.

 I have blocked all further email’s from Brent and his team. The next time I have anything to say to Brent will only be in the presence of my attorney and in court.

 I want to thank all of you for your EXCELLENT investigative work and your continued comments. I am in no means going anywhere until this is resovled but I have closed the door of communication with Brent.

 Please be aware that Brent may be a very dangerous man and may not be beyond harming someone for his own personal gain. Oesterblad has proven throughout the months to be extremely threatening and outright cruel. I have taken various precautions to safeguard myself and family. I have recieved  a death threat and various other threats from this vigilante organization. I would ask that you all stay level headed. Please no threats towards Brent and his family. Again I thank you.

Adam

______________________________________________________________________________

WARNING: If Offendex.com has asked for money to remove your record do not pay them. This site is run by 1 convicted felon and others who have been scamming people out of money for years. Please do not fall for this man’s con. The owners are Brent Marshall Oesterblad, David Osterblad and Chuck Rodrick II currently being investigated by the FBI and being sued by this sites owner. Please understand that after you have given them money they will not take down your information, your information is going to stay on their site until we take it down. I would ask that you recognize that this site is very small in size and not popular by any means. It is merely a scam to convince you that everyone is going to take these people and their allegations about you seriously. In most situations this is not the case.

If you are a business and have gone to offendex.com to get information about someone please be aware that offendex.com is a scam and not to be trusted. We advise all employers to get factual information from their local police departments for free. An online investigation that involves a private entity is very risky. www.offendex.com is a private site and a SCAM. They do not provide truthful public information.

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

This comes from a concerned citizen:

  • Tired of hiding says:
    November 14, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    That subhuman parasite is trying to get offenders to pay the sum of $250 USD to remove their images from his site. That is clearly misuse of the site that the harvested the images from. I say harvested since he places his url on the image implying ownership of the image. This is a violation of the terms of service of the government sites that he illegally steals the images from. The mere fact that his motive is not to educate but rather to extort money from offenders is harassment or even attempted profit from extortion as you mention.

    I would be very willing to join a lawsuit against his website. If enough of us join the suit I am confident that can get this scumbag shut down.

     

    Brent Has actually been asking anywhere form $200 to a  $1000 to remove mugshots and personal pictures.

 

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Adamg1972

General update from Adam →

129 comments on “sorarchives scam”

  1. Anonymous on November 20, 2012 at 9:24 pm said:

    Original Article

    What this site is doing is basically extortion! They are scouring the public registries and filling their own database with information, and apparently a lot of it is out dated, since they never remove it. How is this not extortion? Well, I don’t see where they are making threats, but it’s still exploitation and using the registry to harass others and also make money from public records, which I thought was illegal?

    07/01/2012

    Reply ↓
  2. Mary on November 20, 2012 at 9:25 pm said:

    I just moved to a new house. Shortly after moving in, I found out that a previous tenant had been a registered sex offender with his address (now my address) listed. Although the state sex offender registry rightfully has delisted my address, it is still listed on private Internet registries who have not responded to my request to remove my address. One site, Offendex.com, even wants me to pay them 200 dollars, otherwise they will NEVER take it off! I really don’t have the money for a lawyer to fight this, but I’ve had two windows broken and my car key-scratched, as well as get late-night honks and shouts of “pervert!” all the time, and I’m frankly scared for my family’s safety. Local law enforcement is powerless to do anything. What can I do?

    Reply ↓
  3. anonymous on November 20, 2012 at 9:27 pm said:

    listname • 16 days ago −
    Offendex is a website that is a HUGE SCAM!!! They charge money for people to look up information that is false in the first place, and they charge money to remove false information if your name is incorrectly placed on the list. Not sure which stupid person started this website, but huge fraud – be ware!!!

    Reply ↓
  4. Adamg1972 on November 20, 2012 at 9:28 pm said:

    By Anonymous:

    I’m sorry to say, but you NEED an attorney. If it where me, I can think of several grounds, such as depraved indifference to commit bodily harm, inciting a riot, inciting vigilantism (if you WERE the sex offender, sadly you couldn’t argue that one), abuse of the registry, slander, libel, defamation of character just to name a few. Of course, not all of them would fly, but stacked, I’m pretty sure my name would be removed without a second thought. Think of it, they want $200 to remove you, how much will it cost them to defend themselves.

    Reply ↓
  5. Patrick on November 27, 2012 at 3:45 am said:

    I’ve talked with a Lawyer. He was willing to take the case (and he says there definitely is a case), but when he did research he found the potential defendants to be too difficult to collect from (they had previously declared bankruptcy, and it seemed like they were hiding assets.. so he wouldn’t take the case.

    I’m continuing to file complaints with various groups/government agencies.

    An idea I’ve had, and I would like some input, is to go to Anonymous. Anonymous is the loosely connected de-centralized group of hackers who generally seem to use their advanced grasp of technology to bring justice to the internet, and even the world at large when they can. Now I know there’s not a ton of people that are willing to come to the aid of Ex/confused for/or sex offenders, but I think there’s a chance some of them would see what’s going on here and how terrible it is. It would be well within their power to take down this site, and anyone affiliated with it.

    Anyways, just a thought because the other avenues are either moving too slowly or not working. Not that we can just throw up the “Anonymous Signal”… but I think we could figure out how to contact them if others agree this is something we should try or look into.

    Reply ↓
    • Anonymous on December 21, 2012 at 3:54 am said:

      Well, i can tell you from experience, this would be a bad move. All the way around.

      I’ve had my run-in’s with Anonymous, in particular, the ones in the mainstream media for their “righteous” DoX and hacks.

      It is important to understand, that Anonymous, the particular individuals gaining the most attention in the media are the ones going after sex offenders and “scum”. Right now, there are a large number of sex offenders targeted by Anonymous. I’d leave that hacker culture to do what they do until the FBI catches up with them.

      Reply ↓
      • Adamg1972 on December 21, 2012 at 6:07 am said:

        I can assure you that I have absolutely no intentions of contacting Anonymous. We are progressing quite nicely with an attorney. Going down the wrong road could destroy our chances of shutting down offendex. I can assure you that the site does not have much life left.

        Adam

        Reply ↓
        • Ryan on February 10, 2013 at 10:50 am said:

          I would be glad to be partner to any lawsuit or investigation. I’ve recently received communications in the form of emails from a “Hillary” in “Customer Service” with SOR Archives. I already paid $79 for the review; now they are telling me that I can pay only $421 (the balance of $500) to have my information removed. I have successfully completed 10 years of community supervision and my requirement to register is OVER. Just when I thought that all was done with, now I find these scumbags committing extortion and posting my information all over the web to be removed for profit. This is unfair, underhanded, and cruel. I have served my sentence. Please let me know if I can help with any pending lawsuits or investigations.

          Reply ↓
  6. Adamg1972 on November 27, 2012 at 2:57 pm said:

    Patrick thankyou for the comment. I have thought about the whole taking down the system idea but we currently have an ATTORNEY!!! I didn’t call her she called me. I have also found someone who would be willing to aid in this situation. Here is the thing, we are going to need money. Any donations would be appreciated. If you are intrested in donating money please let me know the amount and we will send information.

    Reply ↓
  7. Charles M. DeShields on November 27, 2012 at 4:43 pm said:

    This issue isn’t about sex offenders. It is about the rights of
    everyone. It is unconstitutional to deny rights to any class of
    citizen. It took us a long time to get this far, we can’t slip
    backward. Take out the word “sex offender” and insert black, woman,
    gay, Jew, Muslim, fat people . . . . Plus, this law doesn’t make
    society any safer. Registered sex offenders have a recidivism rate of
    only 3.5%. The registry didn’t stop Sandusky, did it? Every former
    sex offender should refuse to register. The right to defy an
    unconstitutional statute is basic in our scheme. Especially when an
    ordinance requires a person to register his whereabouts or speech.
    One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Do drunk
    drivers, gang members, murderers, drug dealers or wife beaters have to
    register? Don’t they make our community unsafe?

    Charles M. DeShields

    Reply ↓
  8. Bill on November 28, 2012 at 7:04 am said:

    Due to the nature of their offense, some registered offenders are specifically protected from internet disclosure. The offendex.com enterprise denies this protection and thus directly commits harassment of an otherwise protected individual. Further, the site makes no mention of which member or members of the public is/are being protected by revealing the identity of a compliant, REGISTERED sex-offender.

    Copied-and-pasted from the first page of the California Megan’s Law website:

    Legal and Illegal Uses. The information on this web site is made available solely to protect the public. Anyone who uses this information to commit a crime or to harass an offender or his or her family is subject to criminal prosecution and civil liability. Any person who is required to register pursuant to Penal Code section 290 who enters this web site is punishable by a fine not exceeding $1,000, imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding six months, or by both the fine and imprisonment. (Pen. Code, § 290.46, subd. (k).)

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on November 28, 2012 at 2:47 pm said:

      Very good post! Great explanation Bill.

      Reply ↓
    • Anonymous on December 21, 2012 at 3:57 am said:

      Yes, but that’s a CALIFORNIA law, not a federal law. That is why i am in favor of a FEDERAL registry that is available to LAW ENFORCEMENT and approved employment screening agencies.

      Reply ↓
  9. crsmolti on December 12, 2012 at 2:14 am said:

    I wish that I saw this site before I paid them 80 bucks. I have an expunged record and they still didnt care, giving me their freedom of information b.s. and then ask for more money. Fooled me once, you wont fool me twice. Anyways I am up for a class action law suit.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on December 12, 2012 at 2:23 am said:

      The good thing is, that it is up now. WARNING: DO NOT GIVE OFFENDEX.com ANY OF YOUR MONEY. Please understand that these are con-men at work. They are not going to remove your information they are only here to GET YOUR MONEY. Please do not fall for the devils tactics. Become informed and inform others.

      Reply ↓
      • GordonG on December 12, 2012 at 4:14 am said:

        I think we all should be included in the class action. This effects us all, so the court may very well ask about who is all effected.

        Reply ↓
        • Adamg1972 on December 12, 2012 at 5:31 am said:

          Gordon I hope you understand that we are all in this togeather. I am far from a selfish person what I am doing is not just for me, rather it is for everyone. When I went in to this I did not go in with the intentions of trying to save myself. Offendex has offered to take down all of my information on more then one occasion. Their promise has always been that if I quit fighting they will remove my information. I have had my chances to bow out and I have never thought once about doing it. This is no longer about me anymore, it is about you and all the others.

          Adam

          Reply ↓
          • dc on December 12, 2012 at 11:09 pm said:

            Adam,

            God bless you and thank you for your tireless work in setting right the wrong done by this vigilante group. I have tried multiple times today and last night to access offendex.com and it appears the site is down.

            I would like to call your attention to the PDF they posted of your alleged court documents. On the first couple of pages, the victim’s name is redacted, but deeper into the document, identity is plainly revealed. First and last name.

            In most states, revealing the identity of a sex crime victim in connection with their case is strictly against the law and it may even be a federal offense.

            Just thought I’d point that out. Keep fighting the good fight. No weapon formed against us shall prosper.

          • Adamg1972 on December 12, 2012 at 11:22 pm said:

            Thank you for your comment and kind words. The site is still up. They have a habit of blocking peoples I.P addresses. These guys are not stupid enough to post a victims name which is a pretty clear indication that the whole document is embelished.

            Thank you :)

            Adam

  10. Anonymous on December 17, 2012 at 10:32 pm said:

    Received a call back from certain agency today. At first, seemed like a scam. So i asked to call them back, well, they gave me extension. I looked up number, called them back… and yup, legit.

    Gave them some more info, they thanked me for giving them GOOD information. Total talk time was 40 minutes.

    Morale of story, DON’T GIVE UP.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on December 18, 2012 at 2:17 am said:

      Thank you for your comment.

      Adam

      Reply ↓
  11. Peter Long on December 30, 2012 at 8:28 am said:

    From the Federal Bureau of Prisons website: http://www.bop.gov

    Inmate Locator – Locate Federal inmates from 1982 to present
    Name Register # Age-Race-Sex Release Date

    1. BRENT M OESTERBLAD 25243-008 53-White-M 11-05-1999 RELEASED

    Reply ↓
  12. crsmolti on January 3, 2013 at 3:14 pm said:

    I think that the same people have started another website because it has very similar format. It is called sorarchives.com

    Reply ↓
    • Anonymous on January 4, 2013 at 1:48 am said:

      Yep. Thanks for the information. I’m on it.

      WHOIS record says: Record created on 03-Dec-2012.

      Looks like they know the Offendex name is ruined. Time to start with a new name, right? I knew this would happen. The DNS servers are all the same and so are the DNS zone records as offendex.com. Dead giveaway. Also, all IP addresses for Crescent City, CA are blocked. That’s the city location of one of the people’s he targeted.

      We’ll be working on this also.

      Reply ↓
      • Adamg1972 on January 4, 2013 at 10:40 am said:

        They can try to create what ever they want to. Once we take them out the idea is to stop them from ever doing this again. This site will just be added to the others they have created. Bottom line is we are going after them they can’t do alot when they are bankrupt and in jail. Thank you for this important information we will just add it to the court record.

        Adam

        Reply ↓
        • RC on January 8, 2013 at 7:26 pm said:

          Adam, you can mark me up as another victim of Offendex. I wish I had seen this website earlier.

          I was under a temporary SO registration that expired 3 years ago. The official state SO website removed me from their database and I emailed two other private sites and asked them to remove me as well, which they did. On a whim, I recently did a Google search to see if I was still on any other private websites out there and I found that Offendex had me listed. It pissed me off that the wanted money to remove my name, but I figured since this was the only site out there still listing my name, it would be worth it to just pay them and put the whole thing to rest. Well, I sent them $79 via Paypal last night and today I got this email from them:

          Dear Mr. XXXXX, (redacted my own name here)
          Re/ Record:

          We have reconfirmed the original source of this record from which it was legally obtained. And, we confirmed all the data contained in the record to be correct as originally reported by the authorized Government Agency. The record was released as a public record to the general public per the appropriate statutes. At this time, this remains to be a valid public record.

          Our company and website still publish outdated records. We continue to post records that have been removed from State and Federal Registries. This is why our service is different, We are governed by the Freedom of Information Act and the Laws and statutes of public record.

          If you are interested in a “no questions asked” removal we can get your record removed for the fee of $500.This cost covers Administrative, Legal and Technical resources to remove your record. Since you have already paid the $79, the balance for removal is $421. I can get you an invoice and if interested we can get your record removed within 24 hours

          Thank You, Hillary
          Customer Service

          I plan to file an appeal with Paypal to have the charge of $79 paid back to my credit card. But another thing that bothers me about this is that I moved away from my old address long ago which Offendex lists as my current address and I’m concerned that the current residents of that address may be in some way harmed as a result of this.

          Anyway I plan on following through with the Paypal appeal and I would appreciate you continuing to keep all of us updated on the progress in regard to shutting down this “business”. Thanks for your efforts.

          RC

          Reply ↓
  13. RC on January 8, 2013 at 9:18 pm said:

    Success! That was quick…..

    I filed this complaint with Paypal:

    “You are in the business of extortion. You post damaging and embarrassing expired records, that are no longer public, as CURRENT public records.

    You lead your victims to believe that if they’ll just pay you $79 you will look into whether there is a reason that their record should not be listed on your site, then after you get your money, you state that you have the “right” to continue to publish the record even though official government agencies have determined that the record for that person has expired and is no longer current or applicable to the individual.

    You then attempt to extort even more money from the victim by stating that if they just send you MORE money that equals a total of $500, you will remove the expired record from your website. This is fraud in its purest form.

    I demand full reimbursement with a payback of $79 to Paypal.”
    _______________________________________________________________

    Just 10 minutes after filing the complaint with Paypal, I received this reply:

    Hello,

    SOR Archives has agreed to grant a $79.00 USD refund to settle this dispute. It may take up to 5 business days for the refund amount to appear in your account. This dispute will be closed then.

    ———————————–
    Transaction Details
    ———————————–

    Seller’s Name: SOR Archives
    Seller’s Email: SorArchives@gmail.com
    Seller’s Transaction ID: 6X0879479D6649133

    Transaction Date: Jan 6, 2013
    Transaction Amount: -$79.00 USD
    Your Transaction ID: XXXXXXX
    Case Number: XXXXXXX

    Buyer’s Transaction ID: XXXXXXXX

    Thanks,

    PayPal
    ______________________________________________________

    Now, I believe Offendex was afraid of losing their Paypal privileges if they didn’t cooperate with my demand for a refund, but my original problem still exists…. they’re still listing me on their extortion website. I’d like to see these people SHUT DOWN!!!

    RC

    Reply ↓
  14. Adam on January 16, 2013 at 5:33 pm said:

    They have launched a new site called homefacts.com which is similar to soarchvies.com for extortion

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 3, 2013 at 1:30 am said:

      I am not sure of this connection can you verify?

      Reply ↓
      • Gordon on February 3, 2013 at 4:17 am said:

        HomeFacts has NO ties with the offendex enterprise. I know that as fact because homefacts had no problem removing me and they only list current registrants not past records.

        Reply ↓
        • Incognito on February 3, 2013 at 3:40 pm said:

          Thats a fact. Some of these websites that list your address like HomeFacts, Spokeo and others have removed me from their website when I emailed them. Unlike scum Oesterblad and Rodrick that wont because they have the thought that this is really helping the public with such a good deed that they are doing. Works both ways and since Oesterblad has a record and Rodrick is on his way to having 1, nothing like puting a good website up about them and all there extortion businesses to drown them into the ground. Let them wake up and see where there life turns. Not that they had 1 to begin with. The women that are with them, its all about the money and nothing else. Take away there money and their life and see how they respond to the shit like we are. People that have made mistakes in their life these 2 try and benefit from it. Try working for a living Oesterblad and Rodrick, you might find it more rewarding than stealing it from people you know that are trying to turn their life around. It would be nice to know what High School these 2 went to. I am sure when they were 18 they dated someone under age by a year or two. Lets find out and throw them on the registry and see what kind of arguments they come up with. I would like to see them 2 deny that they did anything like this in Highschool.

          Reply ↓
          • Gordon on February 3, 2013 at 6:31 pm said:

            Incognito, thatnks for your comment and to enlighten you on something. The state that I reside in may be getting involved here. Not going to comment on the detials here because we are being watched, but I will say that considering that fact that we did get charged with something, er should not be harassed and degraded which falls under right to privacy and the right to be left alone and protection from double-jeopardy. Furthermore , Offendex crossed the line when they threatened me to apoligize and then discuss removal options or they were going to release me to other search engines and place me in special spots. Well we all know that removal options entail money. Using a threat like that against me is EXTORTION according to state and federal law. Then they had the nerve in that same threatening e-mail to send me an attachment of my infant son. What does that mean and their intention? Why would they send me a picture of my son? That is why I amde the comment of their intent to cause danger to my baby boy.

    • Incognito on February 4, 2013 at 12:33 am said:

      HomeFacts is nothing really. Their information is different from what sorarchives is doing. Besides, if you goto their site and see a removal part, they will remove you. Just like Spokeo.com
      I had them remove everything on me and they did. No questions asked and no money to pay like the 2 BASTARDS that charge for their BS.

      Reply ↓
  15. Incognito on February 4, 2013 at 12:26 am said:

    Yea, what does that mean when they do something like towards you with a picture of your son. Tells me that would be a pretty strong threat to me. It would make me feel really uncomfortable. There should be something you could do about that and I hope you can.

    Reply ↓
  16. Gordon on February 4, 2013 at 6:26 pm said:

    There is going to be something doen about it. When the judge sees the e-mail that was sent from Chuck Rodrick he/she is going to tell Chuck to get out of the court room he has no claim. Chuck cannot lie in court and say “I did not sen him that treatening e-mail.” You know why he can’t? Becasue the e-mail sent back in November was offendex@gmail.com. During his rambling on the phone he said, send me e-mail at offendex@gmail. Then a week later when Chuck called my phone he threatened me and my wife with a law suit and then said “call my attorney Mr.__________ and ask if Chuck Rodrick is his client.”
    So I told chuck to send me the info so I can call. Good old Chuck said “sure I will send it to you right now.” The e-mail that had his attorney information was from the same e-mail that the threat was in back in November. Either way ALL of Offendex incompetent members will be held liable.

    Reply ↓
  17. Incognito on February 6, 2013 at 2:07 am said:

    I think I will move to Arizona and be this Pricks next door neighbor. Post a sign in my yard saying I live next to an extortionist. An Extortionist Prick who preys off of people trying to make a life for themself with their family. An Extortionist Prick who is not in it for the safety of family’s but money. An Extortionist Prick who cant tell the difference between good people who got a wrongful deal in life than from someone who does what they do intensionally to hurt people. This is a good example, I got a wrongful deal in life and I am trying to turn it around. An Extortionist Prick who builds a website because he says he’s in it for people safety and concern and takes peoples money and lies,,, thats intensional! Even an Extortionist Prick can see that!

    Reply ↓
  18. Gordon on February 6, 2013 at 7:21 am said:

    Hey what happened here? Looks like you guys scared off Brent, he has been behaving himself.

    Reply ↓
  19. Gordon on February 6, 2013 at 10:48 pm said:

    Here is something to think about and I do believe that the majority of you will likely disagree with my OPINION on this, but I am going to share my OPINION anyways.
    Now the actions of Offendex and the sister sites that splinter off of Offendex gave rise to the creation of this here site/blog/forum which we do have the right to free speech to say what we feel necessary on this here site.
    If what they were doing was illegal under criminal statutes that would have been arrested by now, because considering the volume if complaints that law enforcement recieved against Offendex would have driven them to make an arrest. An attorney can say whatever the hell they want to on here, but does NOT necessarily mean that just because they are a licensed attorney and they say something it is absolutely correct at face value. Attorneys are NOT always correct on their stances in law by any means, that is why they lose the majority of cases per career.
    So looking back at the fact that Brent has not been sending harassing, and degrading e-mails, and that sorarchives does not have a bunch of negative bullshit on thier site as it was on Offendex, you can rest assured that we can all sit back and relax because obviously we have accomplished something by having this site, youtube, and other media. Which I give thanks to all. Even though law enforcement has done nothing YET does not mean they will or will not in the future.
    So I wish everyone the best of luck in their future endeavors in life and I remain your friend. This is going to be my very last post because I have more important things to be devoting my time to instead of this pissing match between a stupid ass site that is making money with criminal records, and the law does nothing. So I will sit back and relax and watch all the future events unfold.

    Reply ↓
  20. Incognito on February 7, 2013 at 2:31 am said:

    I agree with you Gordon.
    Half the time the law only listens to MONEY. Though Attorney are helpful, but not always right. I am/was grateful for the Attorney I had when all my legal issues started. It took a lot of money to keep me from losing my battle. If I didnt have that money, then I gaurantee I wouldnt have been sitting with a Misdemeanor Charge in oppose to a Felony charge. But again, it was about the MONEY to save my Innocents on what happend. I do not minimize what I did but the LAW is unfair when it comes to alot of people in the WORLD. Its unfair when we have to battle a site like offendex and sorarchives and the people that run it that claim they’re doing the public a good deed. Is this before or after they take money from people? Its people like this that can’t let good people move on. Its 1 thing to put the one’s that deserve to be on it, on it. But they are too Stupid to distinguish between that.
    But you’re right, I have better things to do than worry about SCUMBAGS like Rodrick and Oesterblad do what they do. Because KARMA will be my justice towards them. I do thank you for this website and it does make me feel comfortable knowing its here. My photo, name, and address may be on sorarchives with what they have. Thats alright, because I am moving and starting over with my life and my kids lives. Puting this behind me because it was put behind me years ago. My time was up years ago and its time to LIVE and let my children be free from this CHAOS and my thoughts of all this crap.
    So, I say before I go, FUCK YOU RODRICK and OESTERBLAD. May you SHIT in the wind and it blow back in your face! Give it time, IT WILL!

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 8, 2013 at 11:07 pm said:

      I understand what both you and Gordon are talking about. I would not want this to consume anybody’s life. I can assure you all, that I will be here for the duration and will be finished when they are finished. I came in to this with one major objective and that was to shut down these mug shot sites. We have gotten rid of one but it has been replaced by others and this is what I want to prevent from happening. I do not let this consume my life but it is a part of life that I can not ignore. It is unjust and I can not allow this to keep happening to all of you or me. So yes take breaks, but please don’t give up.

      Adam

      Reply ↓
  21. anonymous on February 9, 2013 at 12:51 am said:

    The only way to win is to sue in civil court for damages and possibly get a protection order from these people. The problem with that is it will cost more money to sue them than they are asking for to remove your profile. When (not if) you win in civil court for defamation, false light, etc. it will be very hard to collect your judgment. These people are scum and will not stop until the scam is not feasible or they think law enforcement is breathing down their necks. (Which, according to the US Department of Justice, it is.) So all it will take is one person to take them to court, who will it be? Who wants to spend the money? That is the only question we all have to ask ourselves. I see that a couple of us are involved in a civil matter with Rodrick out of Arizona. How is that going?

    Reply ↓
    • Gordon on February 9, 2013 at 4:36 am said:

      Annonymous,
      It is going quite well, funny that you know about it. Yes I got my papers, not like I am scared of their claims that have no merit. They think it is going to be a quick settlement and or judgment. lol I say all the time. They are just trying to scare me into settling, not going to happen. Oh by the way, this does not end in Arizona.

      Reply ↓
      • anonymous on February 9, 2013 at 2:56 pm said:

        The reason I know about it is because I am an excellent internet researcher and I have been waiting for someone to take them to court. Also, Brent has helped me become more familiar with public records searches:

        http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.asp?caseNumber=CV2013-003800

        It is funny that they are the ones who filed in Arizona. I guess they are hoping you don’t show up so they can get a default judgment. I wish you the best of luck and don’t envy you. I know they will lose if you show up and prove that the are/were posting pictures of your family all over the internet. Also that they are/were abusing the registry, which is illegal. I have a letter from the US Justice Dept addressed to one of our State Senators stating that what they are doing is illegal. Like I said before, all it will take is a lawsuit and a little bit of money to take these people down. Don’t be intimidated by these losers because that is their game. They want you to think you will lose so you go hide in your hole and they can continue. The one thing that I didn’t realize in the beginning was that as dumb as Brent sounds/acts, he/they know a little more about the law/court system than I do. Even though what they are doing is illegal/unethical they have been doing shit like this for a long time and seem to know what they can get away with. I suggest you hire a lawyer who can handle your case from afar then you only have to show up to the necessary court dates. Good luck on your case!

        Reply ↓
        • Gordon on February 9, 2013 at 4:09 pm said:

          Greetings,

          Thanks for your input. There are rules that they must follow as far as the court procedures go in regards to being in another state. No court is going to force me to appear, they can subpeona all they want, but they must pay for the travel to the court. lol I have knowledge in the law because I am a student in law. I am about to throw a monkey wrench into it next week. Yes I have to answer to their complaint served upon me, but my response is going to send them in a frenzy. Cannot say what it is on this forum, but believe me Chuck is going to be spending a lot of money pushing his law suit. I do have an attorney[s] on stand by, but I my wife and I are representing ourselves in the beginning.
          Hey you mentiond that Brent and his buddies know law more than you. Brent knows a little, but twists it to conform to his way of thinking. Now Chuck on the other hand don’t know shit about the law and the procedures, other wise he would have represented himself against us and save himselg some money because it is not guaranteed that him or us is going to win, the judge may dismiss the whole damn suit and tell all of us to get out of the courtroom becuase all this is is a big pissing match. Chuck hired an attorney that was willing to listen to his meaningless claims and to get paid doing so, but 90% of civil cases do not make it to trial. This suit is going all the way to trial and then to the higher courts. It will be them spending a lot of money, not I.
          Send us a copy of that letter you got from the US DOJ. And last but not least, Onlinedetective, Brent’s site was sued before and LOST and had to pay thousands of dollars. I have a copy of that case and it will be shown to this court. Total amount of judgment was over $5,000 and failed to appear in court, and this was against webexpress, llc, d/b/a online detective.Filed June 29th 2005. That judgment against Onlinedetective was in the same court that has the pending suit against us. Very interesting.

          Reply ↓
  22. Gordon on February 9, 2013 at 2:51 am said:

    Oh I am by far giving up and will never give up on anything I do to accomplish. Theses people think they are going to win but I beg to differ even though they are entitled to their “opinion” but however, when they go all through their sites and intentionally tamper with the evidence against them by removing their harssing comments makes them look stupid. Just think about it, Offendex claimed that what they were doing was absolutely legal, and Onlinedetective stood upon the same assumption and posted photos of my family without my consent and added defamatory comments about my wife. Now they removed all of that from their sites. Hmmmm makes you wonder if they are attempting to cover up their acts, but if they were doing nothing wrong then they would leave it up on their sites.

    Yes Brent hello. I know you are checking up on this site per your recent e-mail. Brent if you was so confident that what you was and are doing was legal and the courts support you, then why all of a sudden hide it all?

    Reply ↓
  23. Mr. Justice on February 9, 2013 at 11:27 pm said:

    Update, update everyone. I just got a letter today informing me that the info I provided has been sent to the proper office that has jurisdiction over ALL these stupid sites running their crap. Only a matter of time until some individuals are charged for the federal acts they have done to us. No civil law suit is going to save their asses on this one. lol you think a shitty law suit is going to save them from jail time? I think not. Stay tuned because this office in particular do not mess around on getting an arrest and shutting sites down for violations of the law.

    Reply ↓
  24. Gordon on February 10, 2013 at 7:42 pm said:

    Right of publicity. The right to control of one’s own name, picture, or likeness and to prevent another from using it for commercial benefit without one’s consent.

    Reply ↓
    • Gordon on February 10, 2013 at 7:46 pm said:

      The commercial benefit came into play when Offendex illegally obtained my family photo and placed it on their site for commercial gain and to gain public harassment of my wife and children. They think that filing the first suit was going to save them from the RICO Act, but they are in for an embarrassing court hearing. lol

      Reply ↓
  25. Gordon on February 11, 2013 at 5:40 am said:

    Hey Ryan I am sure you are famililar with my name on here and so forth and the fact that there is a pending suit against me and others. I need you to forward me that e-mail from the Hillary person that was sent to you about the $421 please. I need that e-mail asap for proof in my Montana Federal suit. Mt e-mail is gordongrainger76@aol.com They are committing extortion and RICO Act violations by telling you to send an additional $421 when it states on their removal form $79.00.

    Reply ↓
  26. Investigator on February 11, 2013 at 2:30 pm said:

    Hello everyone. Upon investigation this Hillary of customer serrvice for sorarchives is NOT a real person, in fact it is either Chuck or Brent hiding behind that particular e-mail, another attempt to get some money to pay for their frivilous law suit. Add two and two tegether, they are already going to be embarrassed in court if it even goes that far, but they need additional money to keep their bullshit running.

    Reply ↓
  27. Gordon on February 11, 2013 at 5:39 pm said:

    Here is a prime example the reason Offendex, onlinedetective, and sorarchvies needs to be stopped. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/19/patrick-drum-life-sentence-murdering-sex-offenders_n_1897578.html

    Reply ↓
  28. Matt on February 12, 2013 at 3:46 am said:

    Interesting!! I agree that those websites need to be shut down. But the Asshole running it obviously dont care ab out what comes of it because it will disturb their scam and paycheck from it. Anyone who runs a scam like RODRICK and OESTERBLAD only care about RODRICK and OESTERBLAD. For all we know these 2 could have been the ones to send this maniac to do what he did to those 2 sex offenders.

    Reply ↓
  29. Adamg1972 on February 12, 2013 at 6:42 am said:

    ex·tor·tion (k-stôrshn)
    n.
    1. The act or an instance of extorting.
    2. Illegal use of one’s official position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage.
    3. An excessive or exorbitant charge.
    4. Something extorted.

    ————————————————————–
    I think the shoe fits…

    Reply ↓
  30. Mr. Justice on February 12, 2013 at 7:35 am said:

    Well isnt keeping their mug shot on the offendex site a damage to reputation? Be real here,, if a person dont pay to remove the reputation damaging info, then it is extortion dumb ass. lol that.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 12, 2013 at 7:38 am said:

      This man live’s in a delusional world where there is nothing wrong with ripping people off. His five hundred dollar a person scam will come to an end mark my words. In the mean time there really is no talking sense to a crazy man.

      Reply ↓
  31. Mr. Justice on February 12, 2013 at 7:37 am said:

    Sounds like Brent or Brenda osterbooty wants to BBQ weiners and I mean weiners.

    Reply ↓
  32. Adamg1972 on February 12, 2013 at 7:41 am said:

    If he wasn’t so sick he would be funny.

    Reply ↓
  33. Ryan on February 12, 2013 at 8:10 am said:

    Everyone really needs to report these idiots to the Internet Crimes Division of the FBI at www.ic3.gov!

    Reply ↓
  34. Matt on February 12, 2013 at 10:57 am said:

    Oesterblad, You’re a PRICK! You’re a mistake all together. Shows that you only care about who you can scam than your own family. Doesn’t matter what you put them through. I am sure you scam your own family!

    Reply ↓
  35. Ryan on February 12, 2013 at 3:39 pm said:

    SOR Archives has now filed personal and private information as a form of harassment, involving my business name, my wife, my cellphone #, and more, in reply to my RipOff Report filed late last night. Now I have sufficient ammunition to use against them for Defamation and False Light.

    Reply ↓
  36. lawsuit on February 13, 2013 at 9:13 pm said:

    If he claims to be helping society, why does he have the removal without questions option?

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 13, 2013 at 11:36 pm said:

      lol, very good point

      Reply ↓
  37. lawsuit on February 13, 2013 at 9:17 pm said:

    Has anyone reported SOR Services to PayPal? That’s the he uses to where the payments go through;

    SOR Services
    4101 East Louisiana Avenue
    5th Floor
    Denver, CO 80246
    303-628-7677
    303-628-7683 Fax

    Or is he using a fake name?

    Reply ↓
  38. Matt on February 13, 2013 at 9:42 pm said:

    you’re so full of shit I can smell you all the way in another state. Why dont you do what’s right and take the damn site down and everyone can be in peace. Did you have this much drama in your life before you created this scam of a site?

    Reply ↓
  39. lawsuit on February 13, 2013 at 9:49 pm said:

    why is this site’s time on “London” time?

    Reply ↓
  40. Adamg1972 on February 13, 2013 at 11:57 pm said:

    Matt please don’t fall for that bullshit. He just wants your name Bro.

    Reply ↓
  41. Adamg1972 on February 14, 2013 at 12:04 am said:

    “Okay” your welcome “Okay” your welcome. Do you not talk to Chuck? Jaysus.

    Reply ↓
  42. Adamg1972 on February 14, 2013 at 12:05 am said:

    By the way I don’t live in Seattle you idiot. and you got my age wrong, man you are falling apart.

    Reply ↓
  43. In the name of Justice on February 14, 2013 at 12:32 am said:

    If Brent Marshall Oesterblad is claiming to be an attorney and he is representing Offendex and the ohter sites giving legal advice and such, then report him:

    ARIZONA BAR ASSOCIATION
    Main Office
    4201 N. 24th Street, Suite 100
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016-6266

    Phone: 602.252.4804 (from within Maricopa County)
    866.482.9227 (toll-free outside Maricopa County)
    Fax: 602.271.4930

    Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 5 p.m

    Reply ↓
    • hacker on May 2, 2013 at 9:31 am said:

      you can pass the info along to upl@azbar.org.

      Foward any email correspondance you received from SORArchives.com/Offendex.com “legal department” to them.

      Can’t believe we didn’t think of that before.

      Reply ↓
  44. Adamg1972 on February 14, 2013 at 1:23 am said:

    Yea, I am done with this pissing match. If you don’t have anything important to say, you can go away. My battle is not here on this forum rather it will be in a court room.

    Reply ↓
  45. In the name of Justice on February 14, 2013 at 3:11 am said:

    Oh this Brent guy is such an idiot. Aid and Abet, seriously? There is no and never was any grounds on here where a clim can be raised for relief from a court. Brent aided the Offendex extortion, he conspired with Chuck a lucks public intimidation, and obviously HAVE NOT proved a damn thing, but make himself and his partner look stupid.

    Reply ↓
  46. Matt on February 14, 2013 at 3:41 am said:

    Brent, as much as I would like to do that. The times I saw your offendex.com website I saw a lot of harassment going on. I saw a lot of hatred brewing up, why? I’ll tell you why. You took public information and turned it into your own registry. Whether or not some were still on the registry or not. I’m not and I was extremely happy because this was all over for me and behind me. But then you came along. Yeah, so I have spouted off about this. What type of injustice it is. Though I was convicted and I fought it out. It turned out good because of the proof that was presented. But unfortunately I still had to register under a misdemeanor charge. So, no matter what, sending you my information to be removed from your website would be like feeding the fire with gasoline.

    Reply ↓
  47. In the name of Justice on February 14, 2013 at 3:43 pm said:

    Hey Brent. Why are you consistently attempting to get information from Matt? You must be stupid. It is good to read that you are conspiring with the so-called “admin” per se of these wen sites that you are operating for. That names you as “agent of fact” buddy. You will be telling the judge who the admin is, or you will go down as the owner, either way your label of “dummy” will hold thereto.

    Reply ↓
  48. Matt on February 14, 2013 at 10:23 pm said:

    Thing about all of that Brent is that you can remove anyone just as easy as you added one. Circumstances in my case ,regardless of the age, proved out to a misdemeanor charge because of the evidence that was provided. Some of that evidence being my own statement that helped that misdemeanor. Regardless of the circumstances, a few years later my so called victim and I got married and also have a child together now. With her parents also helping me with my fight of this 10 year registration to be removed early. So it goes to show you BRENT that every situation is different and though it may be public information to you for a paycheck. There are alot of people out there that dont deserve what has happend. But there are too many judgemental people out there, such as yourself, that only look at it 1 way, YOURS. SO, if you really wanted to add or remove anyone, it would be under your control do so. But the more people you remove, the paycheck gets smaller.

    Reply ↓
  49. Matt on February 14, 2013 at 10:26 pm said:

    another thing is my attorney has contacted your website and was told I would be removed within 48 hours of the request. Lets see, If I’m not mistaken, 48 hours is 48 hours isnt it? I’m going on 8-9 months now. That is the longest 48 hours of my life.

    Reply ↓
  50. In the name of Justice on February 15, 2013 at 1:48 am said:

    Brent you must be lonely. You keep popping your head up on here like some retarded groudn hog.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 15, 2013 at 2:38 am said:

      lol, I can tell you this, this is not going to be his oulet for spreading more lies and hatred.

      Reply ↓
  51. Omar Wesolick on February 15, 2013 at 2:05 am said:

    great to watch

    Reply ↓
  52. Matt on February 15, 2013 at 3:19 am said:

    You know what BRENT. Everyone’s situation is different. Whether it was a girl or boy that it happend with. Whether someone was 19 or 18 dating a 16 or 15 year old and this happens to them. There are alot of stories and everyone is going to minimize to defend it. I dont care what anyone says, I never minimized my own statement to the Police and the proof that was handed to the court that if I didn’t have that proof I would have been slapped with a FELONY and LIFETIME. Got a MISDEMEANOR and 10 yrs. I have nothing to hide with my situation it would just be very hard to share it with someone that can take my information and and use it against me like I have seen on offendex and sorarchives. I have more power behind me than you think and sitting off in the shadows watching and reading things that go on with what has been going is does pay off some. You put me on there, you can take me off there just as easy. There’s no checking with admin to determine it, not with anyone at that matter. You have the deciding factor according to Mr. Rodrick.
    Let me ask you something BRENT. What is in this for you? What are you getting out of this Sorarchives.com and doing what you are doing? I am very curious to know. Because though it may be public information, I dont know of anyone that would want this much DRAMA that has been stirred up with everything that has been started.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 15, 2013 at 3:35 am said:

      Matt, this is a sick a twisted game for these guy’s I have been watching the work’s of these evil people for a year now. They are in no way normal. Trying to make sense out of anything they do is impossible. If you were to give him your information he will only repay you with a fifteen paged emblished rant. They illegaly post your friends and family members up on there site as your payback for questioning them. They make false allegations and file bogus lawsuits that fall directly in to the category of Malicous Prosecution and Abuse of process. These guys are very dangerous people. In there twisted way of thinking they believe it is ok to take peoples money. I think they believe the world owes them. Knowing all this please be carefull. But please also be assured that this kind of Internet bullying will come to an end.

      Reply ↓
  53. Matt on February 15, 2013 at 10:45 am said:

    I know, I’m seeing everything that is going on. A good scam artist is better than a sales person and I know sales. Sales throw there pitch and make it sound good. But once you buy its not what you thought it was supposed to be. By him telling me that he has to check with Admin to see if my information can be pulled down or not. Why would he have to check with himself to see if my info can be pulled down or not. Its a decision based on a paycheck!I believe soon enough this will take a turn and come right back on them. Its obvious that it has with offendex.com. Which leads me to a question Brent. If you believe that there are numerous LIARS in here and you’re so pushing towards what you think you’re doing is right, then why was Offendex.com shut down? I can read and compare the 2 sites. Between offendex.com and sorarchives.com.
    And what is in it for you and is it worth the Drama?

    Reply ↓
  54. Silence on February 15, 2013 at 4:33 pm said:

    TO EVERYONE ON HERE WHO IS ***NOT*** BRENT OESTERBLAD OR CHUCK RODRICK:

    There is simply no point in arguing with Brent. The best way you can defeat him is by not playing his game. Do not give in to conversations with him. He’s a small, puny man and a predator, preying on who he deems as weak. Show him that you’re strong by not playing his game. By continuing to post on here, you’re giving him exactly what he wants. Starve him of argumentation and beat him at his own game. He WANTS conflict. He WANTS you to type in all caps. He WANTS you to argue with him. He WANTS you to get sucked into an emotional whirlwind. Starve him of that…believe me, it’s the best solution you can possibly hope for!

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 15, 2013 at 8:03 pm said:

      I agree with this 100 percent. Follow suit no more replys for Osterblad. If I have to ban him I will.

      Reply ↓
  55. In the name of Justice on February 15, 2013 at 5:29 pm said:

    Brent. Lets get this staright here. You guys created the sex database to inform the public, to protect the public as you guys say. So is protecting the public entail stealing money from offenders, screwing them over via extortion and racketeering? Furthermore, you guys claim that teh public as a “right to know” about sex offenders; That is true ONLY when an offender is REQUIRED to register. Since you are a boot legged attorney with your ignorant anologies, do some research on USCA and so forth and reveal to the public on here that there is a statue that specifically states that sex offender convictions fall under the right to know.
    Yes we are aware that is it public information, but you will not find a statute saying that it is legal to charge money for removal from data bases. If in fact that this was legal, then a person can create a web site that lists DUI, theft and so forth and charge money for it. The mugshots site does have that, but they do not charge for removal because they are intelligent enough to know that it is illegal to charge a removal fee. Plus, whne a person send your asses money, you demand more and not limited to reposting the record and also keeping the money sent to you and your compadres.
    You are so fixated on sex offenders and I wonder why. Did you get molested as a child, or did you get violated when you dropped the soap in federal prison?

    Reply ↓
  56. In the name of Justice on February 15, 2013 at 6:05 pm said:

    Brent, you claim to be so damn intellident, but you are not by any means. You can quote nice words but your logic is 5th grade level. Save your nonsense for the court and watch all of your enterprise crumble. Guess you expected to win, ha ha ha funny. Good thinking, but your logic on a law suit stinks. Hate to have you as an attorney.
    I am going to laugh the moment I hear that the law suit in Arizona gets thrown out on technicalities. lol and you cant bring them back up either.

    Reply ↓
  57. Gordon on February 16, 2013 at 5:22 pm said:

    I agree with that. Stop giving them attention because that is what they want and feed on. Obviously they are spending a bunch of money for attention and going to lose a bunch of money seeking frivilous attention.

    They started a fight against me especially and expected that I was not going to fight back and they were going to get a quick win. Well they are not going to get any kind of victory over me regardless of who helps them and the money spent. They are on the road to lose against me and funny thing is I will be the one getting paid, not them.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on February 16, 2013 at 6:28 pm said:

      Did you get the chance to see his post about testing the site? I think this clearly show’s there failure in this endeavour. These peoples actions have devastated their work and ultimately their scam. Although Mugshots.com is being sued as well at least they showed that they had some ability to make this scam fly for more than a few months. Osterblad and Rodrick took this way to personal for reason’s we still do not know. I think these guys have some pretty scarey skeletons in there closets, that’s my opinion. Their lack of maturity and any kind of human feeling has ruined their potential to make a “millon” dollars, lol. These guys are idiots but that is a good thing because ultimately none of this would be if it was not for them :) .

      Reply ↓
  58. Gordon on February 16, 2013 at 11:43 pm said:

    You know I was going to stop posting on here but I just cannot bite my tounge any longer. Well think about it, they cannot get money from the removal fee because of their BS actions against us, so they go another route using the court system abusing the process for what it is not intended to be used for. Then Brent calls himself getting on here with his harassing comments thinking that they are not being documented. They need to realize that they are going to lose in court against a bunch of sex offenders. Ha ha ha they cannot swallow the TRUTH and the FACTS!!!

    Reply ↓
  59. Gordon on February 17, 2013 at 12:05 am said:

    Furthermore everyone I got papers from these people and guess what I did? My wife and I filed our answers as required by court procedures, but we also filed our counter claims. Yes they filed their groundless suit against my family. They just made it easier to solidify the actions against them and the evidence I have as well. I still have the recorded conversation CD to be intorduced into the court. Their groundless and frivolious complaint will be dismissed and then my claims against them will continue. I will prevail indeed and get paid for the mental torture they inflicted upon my family and especially the horrfying nightmares that my wife suffers from. They intentionally and maliciously taunted me and especially when they included my infant son which intensified the emotional distress inflicted upon my lovely wife. They should have never envolved her and now they will suffer the consequences of those actions against her.
    Funny that these guys hired attorneys, and my wife and I are representing ourselves and also the counter claim that we filed was in fact approved and read by a handful attorneys that are very impressed with the contentes thereof. I did tell Chuck on the phone when he called me (the one I have on CD), that I was going to dance circles around him and his legal team. lol it is already happening. I have more issues against Chuck and Brent, and as far as Brent goes, I am saving him for another court action on top of the action that is pending.

    Reply ↓
  60. Gordon on February 17, 2013 at 2:44 pm said:

    Funny that Brent calls it “posting slander online.” Plus he claims to be so intelligent to the world. Slander is verbal communication that is in person face to face with another human being. Boy Mr. Brent is so smart.

    Reply ↓
  61. Adamg1972 on February 18, 2013 at 7:08 am said:

    Here is a good definition for slander Gordo:

    slander n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease, or being unable to perform one’s occupation are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious, and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much if not more than printed publications.

    Reply ↓
  62. Gordon on February 19, 2013 at 6:09 am said:

    Sure my email is: gordongrainger76@aol.com

    Reply ↓
  63. Gordon on February 19, 2013 at 2:51 pm said:

    Hey Melvin and Adam. Chuck and yes I say CHUCK RODRICK has until the 24th of this month to comply with my cease and desist demand letter that I mailed to him to remove me off of sorarchives, if he failes to comply, then I will amend my counter claim and then my amended counter claim will have an additional $200,000.00 demand for relief. The Judge is not going to like the fact that Chuck ignored my demand, let alone his attorney, which I will seek for him do be sanctioned as well.

    Reply ↓
  64. Todd on February 23, 2013 at 11:53 pm said:

    Website IP: 98.143.37.105
    Mailto: CWIE – Cavecreek Wholesale Internet Exchange
    Address: 2353 W. University Dr. Tempe, AZ 85281-7223
    Phone: (480) 449-7750, (480) 991-2425

    Physical location: 33°43’57″ North, 111°91’71″ West
    Company name: dBA “Cwie, LLC”
    AS// http://www.bgp.he.net/AS19181

    You’ll have to forgive my ignorance.

    Usually I refrain from acknowledging this phenomena due to my general lack of interest in it, and an understandable depression which results from having been a victim of a sexual offense.

    It is a wound, a memory, that never leaves, even day to day.

    When I first saw the photograph as it was posted, it was being passed around to co-workers on smartphones, then a string of e-mail, then physical copies plastered in interesting places, a fanfare for some of which already had ambitions to see me be unemployed. Especially due to being a very competitive job market, and over other people they enjoyed working with more, being set into my place among them was a short-lived privilege. I did learn a lot.

    I didn’t give it a thought. I work hard. I take risks. I’ve always been an open, honest person. I don’t hide from things. I face it, like the mirror. I don’t scare easily. I don’t really feel humiliated or prideful. I do my job. I am fair, even generous. I enjoy peaceful time spent reading, and listening to local music. I enjoy a good meal, laughter, and tranquil, uninterrupted sleep.

    That ended.

    The more I read, and watch what is going on here, the more I write and review the pages on the internet that matter. The ones you don’t see here. Chat rooms and open forums where identity isn’t as important as the idea. A person, is easily provoked. A person, can be discarded.

    There are larger websites.
    Millions of places to explore.
    There will be other jobs, another day.

    I have visited the site in question. Evidently these few, have decided to go with a more reputable company to hide behind, especially for their rackspace needs.

    I’ve conducted an ongoing analysis, as a new “hobby”

    Perhaps they have even solicited better business partnerships and started their own internet community, out of a grassroots movement to protect children past and present. Perhaps through their efforts they will eradicate crime itself, until it vanishes from our society completely.

    To answer the question in your mind, yes, yes I did. Personally, yes, and I did lose the job. It was a direct result of this website posting. I was replaced immediately. A reputation is a powerful thing. Because there are always plenty of younger people, without one yet built, to replace me. I am not that significant. Now I am truly homeless. My home was burned to the ground by an arsonist. It happened the same week my mother was murdered.

    How much more dangerous does it get, living in a place where it gets down to -50F at night?

    By the way, I AM in the business of building the infrastructure to communities; I AM IN the behind the scenes from high voltage powerlines with the IBEW, to the very powerful servers you know nothing of, where only strong minded trusted men can remain. We are few.

    There aren’t any children in my midst.
    Even my own, I will never see; my only son is gone.

    My wife has divorced me.

    Out of respect for an innocent child, I believe it would be best, if he never were to know his father, ever. It was a mistake to think I would have any sort of normal life. I threw that away long ago. Some children imitate their parents. With this phenomena, ongoing, I cannot take that risk. I would prefer I don’t drag anyone through the shit I’ve experienced.

    And, as it should be, others view this situation as it is, one in which I brought upon myself a long, long time ago. No one feels sorry for me. They feel sorry for my wife, and son. To them it doesn’t matter if it were a 100 years ago, or yesterday. To them, you always are a criminal.

    I make zero excuses. Especially when confronted by a like-minded parent, I am direct. I don’t waste it.

    But, I suddenly have a lot of “free” time on my hands and very little money. Do you think that committing a crime is in my future, or spending my time doing something far more productive?

    I enjoy learning new things.
    So, I’m writing something truly new.

    I am highly interested in the individuals who are part of privately maintaining a database such as this, and optimize associated search engines as a direct result of it. I would like to know where they live. I already know where they work, and to whom they pay their bills. That part, doesn’t take much.

    Public records are a two way street.

    I would like to know how they have determined that profiting by advertising, especially who one group of criminals are, over another, makes them as authors of it, “successful” as human beings. Do they think they have this market cornered? Do they think they have the end all, best business of this sort? Do these people believe they will be successful as business owners, under the current product being offered?

    I would like to understand why it is, they took a piece of legislation passed into law in the heat of the moment, due to horrific deaths, unspeakable and disgusting agony, and went to their next logical step.

    They make money from it, for personal gain.

    They profit from those who have very little. The ones who often are hanging on to life itself, by a mere thread. These few, basically have no regard for how their actions have had an effect on some of the most, potentially destructive, vulnerable people who walk the face of the Earth. These people who are still alive, and walk freely in the world are struggling as much as anyone. Maybe at certain moments, they fight for air, even more.

    Who are these people who invent this standard? They put a computational engine up to what end? Are these perfect people, ordained by our government and God? If so, then I will politely enjoy my silence forever.

    Otherwise, I suggest you now have an opponent.

    So far, I’ve discovered that these people do indeed make mistakes. I see that they don’t truly understand the very thing they are truly selling. That what I have found, they are rather lazy. That what I’ve found, was their legal loophole.

    Posting a “mugshot” to the internet for profit, but not posting every criminal record is unfair due to it’s being selective. It’s incompleteness, is in and of itself, an opportunity. Requiring a person to comply with a law passed after an offense, is more often than not judged unfair in ANY country. At first, they decided to park the vehicle for their delivery device beyond the borders of the United States.

    But, theirs is a flawed business model.

    There have been many companies that learned this the hard way, when collecting content they did NOT produce, in an effort for resale. Sites where they allowed traffic to occur, and posted advertisements. Republishing old data for profit, even from those who have died, does what exactly? Do you believe that there are unknown victims who would find closure here, but first would have to pay for it again? If so, then there IS indeed a market for what you do.

    But these people, don’t offer much. If anything.

    Taking my money, to further your interests, but not treating me as an equal consumer, is an unfair business practice. You took my money, and didn’t DO or GIVE me anything. What is that? In a world of business, I believe, you now will have some more honest competition, much like a restaurant model. What these people serve, is a far cry from palatable.

    For me, I’ve never had a difficult time, perhaps, until now. I’ll keep you posted, once I get to the neighborhood they live in, because I am moving into a place right next door.

    Out of this, the unifying force between those similarly situated has astonished me. I never would have expected it.

    I suddenly have a lot of friends.

    Many who have been very unsettled, have an understanding of my own personal past, and wish to help me in the future. It was made possible by a grave situation, as it has developed, and these people quietly observing, desperately would like to know how, in advance, that I intend to handle it.

    I appreciate this as a forum for discussion.

    For a while, I’ll view only mode. I’ve become a very patient man. Please, bring me up to speed, as I would like to know what you think about there being a better site put in it’s place. The United States was build on competition, just as much as it was on freedom.

    Reply ↓
  65. Gordon on February 25, 2013 at 1:20 am said:

    Here I will give you an update. I will be amending my counter claim this upcoming week with another claim. The person failed to comply with my demand which will only go against them in front of a judge and also award me an additional $100,000.00

    Reply ↓
  66. Gordon on February 25, 2013 at 1:22 am said:

    For each day that the defamation of my character is on their site, it will be an additional $25,000.00

    Reply ↓
  67. Adamg1972 on March 1, 2013 at 6:34 am said:

    Thank you for the very well thought out post. Of course I would have to disagree with you concerning building a site to rival there’s. I don’t like the whole “If you can’t beat them join them” attitude.

    Reply ↓
  68. Gordon on March 1, 2013 at 8:58 pm said:

    I think he is with them because why else would he want to create a site like theirs?

    Reply ↓
  69. chester on March 7, 2013 at 3:30 am said:

    Hey pussy adam.. suck any little boys cocks lately? word is mommy gettin her papers soon! hahahahah her boss at the hospital isnt gonna be so happy with her. sleep well!

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on March 9, 2013 at 10:22 pm said:

      Look’s like these guy’s have decided to take this to a whole new level. If they were men they would not hide behind a static IP. This is a very good example of how wimpy and immature these guy’s really are.

      Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on March 9, 2013 at 11:28 pm said:

      This message is from no other then Chuck Rodrick. In my opinion this was a drunk text. Since we are on the subject of Rodrick, we will be reposting his telephone conversation on youtube shortly.

      Reply ↓
  70. Matt on March 9, 2013 at 10:09 am said:

    so let me ask, did this guy hack this website? Now that I have just started receiving harassing emails from them.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on March 9, 2013 at 10:23 pm said:

      We are working on this now Matt. If in fact they have hacked this site criminal charges will be brought against them. Kinda hope they did.

      Reply ↓
  71. Gordon on March 9, 2013 at 11:09 pm said:

    Well how the hell else did they get the information and sending me e-mails? I doubt they would be that stupid to hack this site. I hope that is what they did,and not someone assisting them, but it seems quite odd that they claim other user names that I do not use on here.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on March 13, 2013 at 6:38 pm said:

      I agree

      Reply ↓
  72. Gordon Grainger on March 21, 2013 at 3:50 pm said:

    Thanks there Adam. I believe in standing up for what is right and will not back down in defense of my family. Chuck went over board attempting to sue me for defamation. However you cannot be sued for stating facts and truth. All documents and the CD of Chuck’s harassing phone call with me has been sent to Chuck’s attorney for him to inspect and discuss with his client in order to prepare Chuck for Perjury. That is correct everyone, I am going to push the envelope far to get Chuck charged for Perjury of claiming and signing the law suit against me on claims that are not in fact true on his end, and the fact that the evidence is in clear black and white that he was convicted for a crime that he committed. So therefore he cannot get around the false allegation of defamation against me when in fact he has a criminal history, and proof that he has this criminal conviction.

    Reply ↓
  73. Bubba on April 29, 2013 at 6:05 pm said:

    LOOK WHO IS THE ONE GOING TO PRISON: http://mugshot-catalog.com/booking/3685302/ADAM-GALVEZ

    Those were some pretty bold predictions you made back on Feb 19. I am sure your sex offender brothers will be very empathic when they learn it is you headed to prison – again. Both irony and karma meeting a VERY deserving pervert. Wow – a third DUI in 5 years. Add the 2 Suspended license infraction while under the last 2 DUIs, plus the other 7 arrest on your record and you are definitely looking at a year PLUS . That must be a scary reality/thought – a convicted cock sucking butt fucking child molester – 12 year old boy – in COUNTY JAIL. That is such just reward for a perv like you. But look on the bright side, you will get all kinds of opportunity to get your wish to “have a man to cuddle and love” – yikes. Yep, there you go, dreams come true. LOL!

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on May 6, 2013 at 8:26 am said:

      You are a coward. Why would you hide if you did nothing wrong? This is not only verification for us but it is vindication. We have scared the living shit out of you and forced you in to hiding. I have a team of people looking for you and we will find you soon. We will drag your low life coward ass right in to court and eventually in to prison again. That is where you belong Brent Marshall Osterblad you are nothing but a low life scum bag, worthless and a danger to our society. Your return to prison would certainly make this world a much safer place.

      Reply ↓
  74. Anon on May 3, 2013 at 9:12 pm said:

    I have 3rd party eyes on him now.

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on May 6, 2013 at 8:21 am said:

      Please continue to keep us updated on whatever you might learn. We are struggling to find Brent Marshall Osterblad. Please advice us if you find out anything about his address or his general whereabouts. I believe that he is still in Arizona but he is ducking the law. It is very important that we find him.

      Reply ↓
      • Gordon on May 7, 2013 at 12:21 am said:

        My “opinion” says that if Brent was ducking the law per se as in avoiding of being arrested, then Chuck would have been arrested by now. We all see the favoritism going on in Arizona with law enforcement, other wise they would have been charged. I am really glad the the court so far is not in their favor.

        Reply ↓
  75. Gordon on May 4, 2013 at 9:22 am said:

    Fuck Oesterblad. He has proven to be a coward. He talked all that tough man wannabe attorney bullshit and claimed to be knowing the laws and was contracted by Chuck to do the stupid research work. Well obviously I already made CHuck look unintelligent, I want to make Brent look the same. But wait, we all have already done that and in fact he has made himself look stupid by avoiding service from the court.

    Reply ↓
  76. Gordon on May 7, 2013 at 7:47 am said:

    Okay. I am not going to name any “names” here, but I find it quite interesting that the blog I created on blog.com is not working anymore, let alone blog.com’s servers. Sounds to me that the person[s] doing this is hacking and that is a federal crime. It is my opinion that there is some attorney involved in assisting the individual[s] doing these acts. Well I will spend this weekend creating Youtube videos and numerous blogs about the law suit. They will NOT destroy youtube like they did to my blog, and lets see how they like the exposure and see if they are stupid enough to take my freedom of speech posts.

    Reply ↓
  77. Bubba on May 11, 2013 at 5:00 pm said:

    Ouch! That is what you call an old fashion Federal Court beat down. The lawsuit is so bad it just wasn’t enough for the Federal Judge to Deny the TRO – he had to comment on the base complaints of the entire case. What was it again – on all issues – that’s right : No Merit! No Merit! No Merit!

    And we haven’t even gotten to some of the juicy details – like Doe 2 – Mr Q – not even making any contact until March 27th — but wait a minute – the lawsuit filed by Janice claiming the events had already occurred – and that was on March 20th — Gee – now how could that happen. Do I hear Rule 11 Sanctions. And now I hear there are excellent grounds to have fun with the counter suits to all the John and Jane Does – who will be named in this round – they get to have all their names and details front and center

    Funny – I don’t see any updates on your lawsuit page – you wouldn’t be hiding the FACTS – again. Oh yeah, my bad – that is what you do.

    BTW – what were the US Supreme Court cases the Federal Judge cited throughout his ruling – Cox Broadcasting – Smith/Doe – CT DPS – — gee, where have we seen those before?

    Reply ↓
    • Adamg1972 on May 12, 2013 at 6:45 am said:

      Oh look everyone it’s the guy who is dodging service. Oh and why is he dodging service? Well it’s not just because he’s a pussy It is also because he knows that he is guilty therefore he has gone in to hiding. Yep folk’s that’s right this man is no other then BRENT MARSHALL OSTERBLAD. You can see a picture of his ugly fat ass on his very own page, oh and his skanky wife is there as well. Osterblad is doing what Osterblad does and that is embellishing the truth. YEP OSTERBALLS is the king of embellishment. We have already mentioned the fact that the Judge did not OK the TRO on facebook. Osterblad is simply doing what he does best and that is twisting the fact’s to satisfy his own sociopathic brain. Osterblad is unfortunately one of these guy’s that doesn’t realize that he has “MENTAL HEALLTH ISSUES” and I mean the serious kind. There is of course no threat that the names of the John and Jane Does will be released. There is no chance of Janice facing RULE 11 sanctions. We are however now aware that Brent Marshall Osterblad is getting his information from one of the attorney’s who could face sanction’s for not giving out the whereabouts of Brent Marshall Osterblad. This person is so extremely unintelligent that he get’s people in trouble because he just can’t keep his darn mouth shut. This is actually a good thing for us and because he lacks so much intelligence we do not fear that he will catch on to what we are talking about here. Have a nice day Osterblad oh and don’t get yourself to bent out of shape.

      Reply ↓
      • Gordon on May 12, 2013 at 9:08 am said:

        Listen Adam. We already know where Brent is getting his information from. Obviously he got it from Chuck because as you know the hearing that took place a few days ago, Brent was not there to listen and he emailed me the details about the hearing, otherwise where else does he get the info from? Quite frankly sanctions need to be imposed behind the actions of that because the hearing was not a public hearing as a trial would be.

        The attorney knows where Brent is because he had him sign something, other wise he forged his name.

        Reply ↓
      • Adamg1972 on May 18, 2013 at 4:50 am said:

        Mr. Galvez,

        For whatever reason I could not post a message at your website offendextortion.com

        Here is some info that might be useful to anyone who contacted you and was unable to be in the lawsuit with Ms. Janice Belucci.

        There is an attorney in Toledo, OH who is suing several of these mugshot websites, including sorarchives.com (offendex.com). His name is Scott Ciolek. Most of his clients in this lawsuit are from Ohio, but he is taking clients from all over the country.

        Here is his contact info:

        Ciolek, Ltd

        Attorneys at Law

        520 Madison
        Suite 820
        Toledo, OH 43604

        Phone (419) 740-5935
        Fax (866) 890-0419

        Here is the link to the website. There is an online form to fill out.

        http://www.counselor.pro/articles/class-action-lawsuit-against-mugshot-websites

        Hope this is helpful. Let me know if I can be of further assistance.

        Sincerely,

        Fight for Justice 2013

        Reply ↓
  78. Adamg1972 on February 13, 2013 at 4:07 pm said:

    lol, hardly. How is your ripping off inocent people working out for you. Your a rider. get off the bus. Rodricks claims are just more harassment and omg so frivoulous. Your really hung up on this child molestation thing is there something we should know about you??? You got issues pal. You would be the last person that could hurt my feelings. Your pathetic.

    Reply ↓
  79. Adamg1972 on February 13, 2013 at 5:26 pm said:

    Well I am glad to see you admit that you are hung up on the child molestation thing. Brent Marshall Osterblad who’s wife is Shea you are not the one somebody is going to come to for accurate information. You Mr Brent Marshall Osterblad are a convited con-man. Any smart person would know to avoid you at all costs (no pun intended). You are not doing anybody any justice. You are still very wrapped up in your con-man ways. Your a thief Osterblad and you can not ever be trusted. The only reputation you have is that of a con-man so no big loss. Anything else we haven’t already heard CONMAN??? You have absolutely no imagination, you must be miserable.

    NEXT…

    Reply ↓
  80. Adamg1972 on February 13, 2013 at 11:41 pm said:

    HAHAAHAHHA, That was a great laugh, thank you. Your claim’s of Susan’s involvement is just another form of harassment you bone head. You don’t think that my Mom will take action against you for these false alegations???? OMG YOU ARE SO STUPID!!

    Reply ↓
  81. Adamg1972 on February 14, 2013 at 2:05 am said:

    There is only one liar here and we all know who that is. According to reliable sources your name is not on that suit. Why is that Osterblad?

    Reply ↓
  82. Adamg1972 on February 15, 2013 at 3:07 am said:

    I wonder if he realizes that he is only making his buddy Rodrick’s case that much more frivoulus. He continues to harass us on this site. The only reason why I am allowing him to say anything in this forum is to show malice. Think he will get the hint? Maybe he need’s legal representation? …

    Reply ↓
  83. Adamg1972 on February 15, 2013 at 3:09 am said:

    I think this proves the low quality of inteligence this guy has…

    Reply ↓
  84. Adamg1972 on February 19, 2013 at 7:23 am said:

    I see they are trying to start some crap with you Melvin. These guy’s act so imature. Make sure you keep all of the evidence of harassment from these guy’s Melvin. I have also seen that they have now officialy made the connection between the site sorarchives and onlinedetective. We know that OSTERBLAD owns onlinedetective it is now in court documents. I think this proves that they are lying about their ownership of offendex.com and sorarchives.com. The only reason why they would be lying about this is because neither one of them have paid taxes, so the plot thickens. At this point I can see Osterblad deffinently going back to prison and Chuck could possibly be making his first visit to the big house. Do not let these guys scare you they won’t be doing this “Forever” as they like to say. Hang in there. Get in contact with me.

    Adam

    Reply ↓
  85. hacker on May 2, 2013 at 9:38 am said:

    It appears he’s in Queens Creek area right now.

    Reply ↓
  86. Adamg1972 on May 3, 2013 at 3:12 pm said:

    He’s pretty bold to be using one of his IP’s. We have a lot of people looking for him and we will find him. For those of you who may not know who we are talking about this would be Brent Marshall Osterblad. Anybody that might have information on this scum bag please let us know immediately.

    Reply ↓
  87. Sharon on May 23, 2013 at 11:58 pm said:

    Can anyone tells what’s going on the lawsuit conclusion? Why the scum website is running still? and all of victims info/photos been revealed? Please make a complain by call at 1-877-438-4338, or file a complaint online: www.ftc.gov.

    Reply ↓
  88. Adamg1972 on May 24, 2013 at 3:10 pm said:

    The lawsuit is still in progress. To early to determine when their site might be taken down.

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

HTML tags are not allowed.

Categories

  • Updates

Hello everyone,
Please continue to notify me if you are having problems with sorarchives. The email is adamg846@aol.com.
Thank you EVERYONE!
Adam

Anything that you could donate for legal fees would be greatly appreciated





Categories

  • Updates

Recent Comments

  • Adamg1972 on sorarchives scam
  • Adamg1972 on Please make your $5.00 donation Our “Give Us Five” Campaign (We Really Need Your Help!)
  • lorna on Please make your $5.00 donation Our “Give Us Five” Campaign (We Really Need Your Help!)
  • Sharon on sorarchives scam
  • Adamg1972 on Please make your $5.00 donation Our “Give Us Five” Campaign (We Really Need Your Help!)

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

© 2013 OffendExtortion.com